| Gesamte Bewertung |
 |
| Beschreibung |
| Ever since its launch in 1991, Clio has represented cheap chic plus stylish Gallic flair. Ten years on, it's still a pleasing supermini but it no longer leads the pack. |
| Behandlung |
|
| Komfort |
|
| Qualität U. Zuverlässigkeit |
|
| Leistung |
|
| Raum |
|
| Laufende Kosten |
 |
| Wert für Geld |
|
| Stereo/Saß Nav |
|
| NCAP |
| 4 |
| Beste Modelle |
| 1.4 16v Privilege; 2.0 RenaultSport 172 |
| Schlechteste Modelle |
| 1.2 8v Authentique |
|
 |
| Straße Test |
| Clio's appeal has always been as a cheerful car that's easy to own, affordable to buy and cheap to run. But rivals such as the current Fiesta, Micra and Polo have raised supermini buyers' expectations to the point where Clio falls behind. Strong points are Clio's visual identity, a high safety rating, and generous equipment levels (all have ABS, electric windows and remote locking). Fuel economy is good (the 1.5 dCi diesel can give over 65 mpg), service intervals are long, and insurance ratings start at Group 2. The 16-valve petrol engines are lively; the 1.2 16v is eager, while the 1.4 16v and 1.6 16v are positively sporty. For real hot hatch credibility, go for the RenaultSport 172. What lets Clio down is an all-round lack of refinement, an uninspiring cabin that's smaller than the best rivals, and handling that falls well short of Fiesta or Micra standards. |
| Positive Punkte |
- Wide choice of good value models
- Distinctive styling; looks sportier than some rivals
- Good fuel economy and long service intervals
|
| Negative Punkte |
- Ride is rather hard at low speeds
- Rear legroom is tight for adults
- Loud engines; awkward clutch and gear-change
|
|
Sign In | Sell My Car » 
